|
HOME
VALLEY
THREATS
Development
See Home Page
Industrializing Rural
Community
New Plateau
Roads
to Valley
Flood Control
Lahar
(coming soon)
the article we mean
VALLEY
HERITAGE
School Reunion
Page
See Reunion Pictures
Alderton/McMillin
Class
Pictures
Alderton
School
School Bldg Pictures
Old Classmate
Pictures
McMillin
School
School
Bldg Pictures
Old Classmate
Pictures
VALLEY
DEVELOPMENT
Alderton-McMillin
Community Plan
Alderton/McMillin
Community
Planning Board
Statement
Visit Your
Valley
PICTURE ALBUM
2006 Puyallup River FLOOD
Pictures
FLOOD Powerpoint
HarvestFest
Local Property
Owner Plan
MATLOCK FARM DEVELOPMENT
PLANS
Learn More
See Map
EACH WEEK...
TAKE TIME TO DO SOMETHING GOOD
FOR AMERICA
Make Certain
That Our CHANGES
are Constitutional
VICTORY TO OUR TROOPS

God Bless
America
savepuyallupvalley.org
Web Editor: David Hill
Page last updated on:
Oct 29, 2011
| |
Orton Junction:
Impacts On the Puyallup Valley
by Maxine Herbert-Hill
RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD
Surrounding neighborhoods will loose key characteristics of rural area.
With urban development comes traffic, noise and night time light.
These are contaminants to a rural area. There has been no discussion of
this at all. The best they could do is plant some tall poplar trees and
other dense trees and shrubs to help screen the light. It will still filter
through and you can’t do much of anything about the contamination of the
night sky. A rural area is dark and quiet at night. How are they going to
protect the character of the adjacent rural area? In due time, it will be
determined that this does not have the character of a rural area and will
claim that it is developable because of it. And so it will go. The “green
wall” as they call it, will be neither green nor a wall. SR410 was an
effective wall to divide the urban area from the rural and farming region.
There is nothing they can create that will be as strong a divider as that
highway.
Traffic will compromise safety for those who live in the rural
area. We have no idea if or how the developers will change Riverside Drive
or 166th beyond the confines of the development. The projected volume of
traffic will suggest sidewalks would be necessary for public safety – if
anyone thinks that’s important. However, sidewalks themselves are an urban
characteristic, not rural. (This was discussed at some length in the
Community Planning process.) It is my prediction that no sidewalks will be
put in, the “rural” community will rightfully demand something to protect
their safety and then be taxed to put them in, out of necessity and poor
planning. There needs to be some kind of $1 million escrow account or
something that the developers must provide for such eventualities, held in
trust for at least 10 years after the full build out.
USE BACK ARROW TO RETURN TO PRIOR PAGE POSITION
OR
TOP
HOME
|